Is there anything wrong with this?

General and Offtopic Conversations. The forum to discuss world news, music, generic movies, politics, social issues and sport, everything that is not related to vegetarianism goes here.
User avatar
Trev
Vegan Talk Frequenter
Posts: 39
Joined: Dec 8, 2010 4:14 am

Is there anything wrong with this?

Postby Trev » Dec 8, 2010 6:43 pm

I was reading the newspaper today and came across a SmileTrain ad. You must have seen these ads before, whether a tv commercial or whatnot, where the suffering child in need is being introduced by the charity.

Now I am all for giving money in order to help people as I often donate to different charities, vegan ones are my favorite! I went to visit the SmileTrain website after seeing that ad and right on the homepage is a kid with a cleft lip with tears rolling down his face. Is this exploiting the kid? I want to donate money to help them have a surgery but i'm not sure if the methods of advertising to get to people to donate is the most ethical.

Anyone have thoughts or feelings on the positives and negatives of showing such graphic images of these kids in hopes of making people feel empathy to give money?

BigBecka
Lord of the posts
Posts: 513
Joined: Dec 2, 2006 7:53 pm

Re: Is there anything wrong with this?

Postby BigBecka » Jan 7, 2011 5:39 pm

I hate those adverts so much! I once had an arguement with someone collecting for a childrens' charity that claimed to be against child abuse, and showed really upsetting and emotive TV adverts. I told him I was more likely to donate if I actually knew where the money was going. He couldn't actually tell me what positive things they were doing other than "raising awareness." Legally they can't really do anything other than assist government social services anyway. Quite often these charities have paid employees, including a chairperson or CEO who is paid very highly - sometimes in the region of millions of pounds :o

For foreign aid, even if aid is purchased and does reach the foreign country, sometimes the local government or militia will comandeer the aid and use it to solidify their position. It may never reach the people it was intended for :cry:

I don't really agree with charity anyway: I think it's better to apply political pressure. Like, I vote for political parties who support a welfare state and promise money/policies that will aid homelessness, increase care for the vulnerable, etc. It's also a good idea to buy goods that are fair trade and against exploitation - I went to a talk by a Mozambique Cashew Nut farmer last year, and fair trade had really made a difference to her community :) I also liked the "Drop the Debt" campaign for the third world - this makes more sense to me than providing charity (and ultimately creating a system where people become reliant on charity).

If I do support a charity, I will choose one that is well-known for taking action (like Oxfam) - my office always used to buy a water pump or goat for some village somewhere at Christmas instead of sending each other cards :D

zerolife
Vegan Forum Beginner
Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 22, 2011 2:13 am

Re: Is there anything wrong with this?

Postby zerolife » Jan 22, 2011 2:25 am

I don't think using these kids in charity ads qualifies as exploitation as long as the entity producing the ad isn't profiting by it. That said, these ads are a little discomfiting. I can't imagine being the well-fed photographer or whatever, you come in, do the ad, and leave. How's that feel?


Return to “General Conversations”